Archive Page 4 of 33



Is the future of eBooks social?

With the recent proliferation of eReaders, it must be worth asking the question: is the future of eBooks and eReading social? After all, these devices are connected to the web, where our online social networks are.

It seems to make sense that the next step would be to share thoughts and examples of what is being read. I already share many thoughts on social networks about what I’m reading at any given time. I’m sure many people do.

As a beginning, it may be worth noting that Amazon already displays such things as the ‘Most Highlighted Passages of All Time’ and ‘Heavily Highlighted Recently’, from the new social highlighting feature of kindle books.

Amazon Kindle most highlighted passages of all time

In terms of social eReading, here are a few other possibilities, as recently suggested by Kevin Rose. And let’s face it, most of these will probably happen soon enough in one form or another:

  • Friend annotations – highlighting paragraphs and leaving voice annotations for friends. (As I said above, Amazon has already implemented part of this).
  • Lend a book to a friend by hitting a button and choosing a friend to lend to.
  • Seeing how far friends are into the same book you are reading.
  • Virtual book clubs – seeing who out of your Facebook and Twitter friends is reading the same book, so you can discuss it with them.

I don’t know about you but virtual book clubs seem to make a lot of sense to me, considering how popular they have been offline over the years. It seems like these would work pretty well online, in connection with eBooks. This is even something smaller, independent book sellers could start, or host, as a way to help compete with the big online retailers.

Academic Joshua Tucker has also pointed out some of the benefits and possible pitfalls of social eReading. On discovering the Amazon social highlighting feature by surprise, what disturbed him was that he could not find a way to opt out of sharing his own highlights.

The issue of privacy is one that may disturb some people, and will not bother others at all. As Tucker points out, now Amazon knows what books you have downloaded, they know which passages of the book you find interesting and can make recommendations on what you might be interested in buying based on them.

Tucker mentions that he found the collection of highlights at the end of the book most troubling as a professor, as the temptation for students may be to just read the social highlights and not read the whole book.

Another interesting issue to me, is that book authors may soon have the opportunity for feedback from readers, as blog authors do.  As Tucker says, the possibility may exist for authors to see which parts of the book people are highlighting, and even to be able to answer questions from readers.

Do you like the idea of eReading becoming more social, or would some of these features be too much of a distraction? Do you think the privacy concerns are a serious issue, or overblown?

More sharing options:
  • email
  • Add to favorites
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Tumblr
  • Reddit
  • Ping.fm
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • Posterous

Google says govts blocking info flow are blocking free trade and economic growth.

With the release of a new white paper via its Public Policy Blog, Google is urging governments everywhere to take specific steps to “break down barriers to free trade and Internet commerce”.

Google maintains that according to one study, more than forty governments are now involved in the restriction of online information by such practices as blocking online services, imposing non-transparent regulation, and seeking to incorporate surveillance tools into their internet infrastructure.

With a focus firmly on commerce here, Google is asserting that these practices are the trade barriers of the 21st century, and steps should be taken to remove them. Google is calling for new international rules to provide increased protection against these 21st century trade barriers.

Do you think the economic benefits of the Internet are under threat from governments imposing limits on information flow? Are certain countries shooting themselves in the feet, economically speaking, by restricting, regulating and censoring information flowing in and out of their borders?

More sharing options:
  • email
  • Add to favorites
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Tumblr
  • Reddit
  • Ping.fm
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • Posterous

What would a global civilisation with a collective mind look like?

Lately I’ve been thinking more on the subject of this great human hive humanity is currently creating, in the form of our insatiable and widening use of the internet.

In just 20 years we have come to the point where almost 2 billion of us now use the internet, and no doubt that will continue to grow until most of us are communicating online on a regular basis, however long that takes.

Star Trek references aside (to The Borg hive mind), as I know someone will mention it, the question remains: is all this mass connectivity leading to a global civilisation with a collective mind? Is it an inevitable part of our social, technological and cultural evolution as a species?

Let’s just say the answer to that question is yes. Will this collective mind be able to help solve our greatest problems, such as climate change? Will it create new problems, such as large scale cyberwarfare? Will life on the internet just play out as it does offline or will it be different? Perhaps the answer is all of the above.

As usual I’ve already floated these ideas on Twitter, a part of this global hive mind in the making (now close to 2oo million users worldwide). It was suggested at one point that the general level of discourse on the web is not high enough at present to be able to achieve anything of real value in a collective sense.

My answer is that it doesn’t all have to be of crucial importance and of great value. Like conversation, the collective mind will wander, will concern itself with trivial matters and pointless entertainment, and “oh look at that silly cat” and celebrities and so forth. Like conversation itself, it can be trivial, it can be awkward, it can be small, it can be big, it can be vitally important. It can have a sense of urgency. It can be relaxed and slow. It can be a lot of things.

Someone also mentioned that it may be a disastrously disconnected global mind rather than a cohesive, perfectly in-tune collective consciousness. My answer to that is that perhaps it doesn’t need to be pretty or perfect, maybe it just has to be.

More sharing options:
  • email
  • Add to favorites
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Tumblr
  • Reddit
  • Ping.fm
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • Posterous

Foursquare and Facebook Places: educate me, entertain me, supersize me.

I thought I’d share a couple of nearby Foursquare offers as a snapshot of what’s going on in the geolocation space, just in my local area. Regular readers will know I’ve written a few other posts about Australian businesses experimenting in the geolocation space.

I see we have the University of Technology, Sydney offering a free movie ticket for the Foursquare Mayor of the UTS Library on a certain day. Interesting new way to encourage students to study? If you come an study at the library regularly, we’ll reward you with some entertainment.

UTS Library Foursquare offer

Of course we also have fast food chains starting to offer the “supersize me” types of deals we’re all familiar with.

Never to be outdone, I see that Facebook is now introducing Facebook Deals, which is layered on top of Facebook Places, to provide a similar service to local businesses and users of Facebook.

What kind of offers have you seen in your local area? Anything that’s tempted you yet?

More sharing options:
  • email
  • Add to favorites
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Tumblr
  • Reddit
  • Ping.fm
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • Posterous

Facebook is all Green now, don’t give us any more suggestions please.

Perhaps in response to the earlier reported pressure from Greenpeace and others, Facebook has put up a ‘Green on Facebook’ page, highlighting the company’s “efforts to be a green and sustainable global citizen”.

Green On Facebook

The page has information on Facebook’s environmental and energy efficiency programs, and has links to its energy efficiency partners, such as Digital Energy Solutions Campaign, Alliance to Save Energy and The Green Grid.

Facebook may be correct in asserting that “By enabling millions of people from diverse backgrounds to easily connect and share, we believe we can help unleash innovative environmental initiatives across the globe.”. In addition, it appears that Facebook has now realised, with more than a little pressure it has to be said, that it should also lead by example.

An obvious question now, given how big Facebook has become, is: do you think Facebook is doing enough? Facebook’s stated programs and energy efficiencies now include:

  1. Encouraging recycling and composting throughout Facebook facilities.
  2. Reducing water consumption by nearly 60%, including auto/dual flush toilets and motion sensor faucets.
  3. Motion sensor controlled lighting, reducing energy consumption by 60%.
  4. A Green transportation program offering shuttles, car and vanpooling, bike racks and subsidised public transport for employees.
  5. Facebook has designed a programming language (HipHop for PHP) that provides 50% CPU savings, meaning fewer servers are needed.
  6. Facebook has made the storage of user photos more efficient, so it uses 20% less power than industry standard storage architecture.
  7. Facebook has invested in and is introducing various data center efficiencies on an ongoing basis.

Not bad. They have also added a “Have any further suggestions related to Facebook and the Environment, submit it here” link, but strangely enough, when I clicked it, it came back with:

Facebook page not foundHmm, bit of an oversight there. No doubt they’ll fix that. They do allow comments on their wall though. I noticed quite a lot of “No To Coal” spam there as it happens.

More sharing options:
  • email
  • Add to favorites
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Tumblr
  • Reddit
  • Ping.fm
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • Posterous